Cases 1 - 10 of 30
Ring v. Chandler, City of et al
as 2:2024cv00630
Plaintiff:
Nancy Ring
Defendant:
Chandler, City of, Kristoffer Buchanan, Samuel Wagner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ROBERSON v. DEANDA et al
as 7:2023cv00145
Plaintiff:
DENNIS ROBERSON
Defendant:
ERIC DEANDA, ISHMAEL FLORES, PATRICK GILLIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00018
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Deanda v. Becerra
as 23-10159
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Alexander R. Deanda, on Behalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated
Defendant / Appellant:
Xavier Becerra, in his official capacity as Secretary of Health and Human Services, Jessica Swafford Marcella, in her official capacity as Deputy Assistant Secretary for Population Affairs and United States of America
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02191
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv07536
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv04518
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv08577
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv09237
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Deanda v. Becerra et al
as 2:2020cv00092
Defendant:
United States of America, Alex M. Azar II, Diane Foley and others
Plaintiff:
Alexander R. Deanda
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
