Civil Rights Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 70
dais deapocalypse bey v. Clapprood, et al
as 24-1312
Plaintiff: RA DAIS DEAPOCALYPSE BEY
Defendant: CHERYL CLAPPROOD, Superintendent, Springfield Police Department and CRAIG MOREL, President, CJ Towing
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv09056
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv06018
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Santana v. Waters et al
as 3:2023cv00677
Plaintiff: Bernardo Santana
Defendant: Sheriff Mike Williams, Sheriff T.K. Waters, Officer M.A. Morel-Sepulveda and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
dias deapocalypse bey v. Clapprood et al
as 3:2023cv30026
Plaintiff: ra dias deapocalypse bey
Defendant: Cheryl Clapprood and Craig Morel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Morel v. Brock et al
as 1:2022cv03837
Plaintiff: Jeremy Morel
Defendant: Timothy Brock and Darin Hull
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Clervrain v. Haget et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv02225
Plaintiff: Manetirony Clervrain
Defendant: Tre Haget, Christopher Erlewine, John E. Hyten and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00363
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990
Hollett v. Williams et al
as 3:2022cv00062
Plaintiff: Chad Dennis Hollett
Defendant: Mike Williams, M. A. Morel-Sepulveda, T. D. Yorton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McLaughlin v. City of Methuen et al
as 1:2021cv11846
Plaintiff: Ashley McLaughlin
Defendant: Methuen, City of, Tracey Noonan, Richard Sawyer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?