Cases 1 - 10 of 96
Gaines v. Grand Lodge of Maryland et al
as 1:2024cv01456
Plaintiff:
Stephen A. Gaines
Defendant:
Grand Lodge of Maryland, Regent University and Anthony Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Schiff v. Brown
as 8:2024cv00447
Plaintiff:
Graham Schiff
Defendant:
Anthony Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 dp Civil Right Denial of Due Process
Graham Schiff v. Anthony Brown
as 23-2302
Plaintiff:
GRAHAM HARRY SCHIFF
Defendant:
ANTHONY BROWN, In his official capacity as Attorney General of Maryland
Dennis v. Pazen, et al
as 23-1313
Plaintiff / Appellee:
SUZY DENNIS
Defendant / Appellant:
PAUL PAZEN, in his individual capacity
Defendant:
CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, COLORADO, CITY OF ARVADA, CITY OF GOLDEN and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv05851
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Browne v. Reynolds et al
as 3:2023cv00053
Plaintiff:
Anthony Arthur Browne and Anthony Browne
Defendant:
Governor Kimberly Kay Reynolds, Johnson County Sheriff, Kim Reynolds and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 fa Declaratory Judgment- Firearms
Brown v. Anderson et al
as 2:2023cv00902
Plaintiff:
Maurice Anthony Brown
Defendant:
Gary Ernsdorff, Manion Satterberg, Rhyan Chelsea Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Brown v. Murphy et al
as 2:2023cv00835
Plaintiff:
Maurice Anthony Brown
Defendant:
Matthew Murphy, Eric Doherty, Rafael Padilla and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Schiff v. Brown
as 1:2023cv01376
Plaintiff:
Graham Schiff
Defendant:
Anthony Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Graham Schiff v. Anthony Brown
as 23-6166
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GRAHAM HARRY SCHIFF
Defendant / Appellee:
ANTHONY BROWN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
