Cases 1 - 10 of 1,175
Kotevski v. Clinton et al
as 3:2024cv00310
Plaintiff:
Milan Michael Kotevski
Defendant:
Hillary Rodham Clinton, William Jefferson Clinton, Estate of George H.W. Bush and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Be the Bush Recovery Ministries v. Coffee County, TN
as 24-5538
Plaintiff:
BE THE BUSH RECOVERY MINISTRIES
Defendant:
COFFEE COUNTY, TN
Heron Cove Association et al v. Midland County Board of Commissioners et al
as 2:2024cv11458
Plaintiff:
Heron Cove Association, Charles Aguirre, Laurie Aquirre and others
Defendant:
Midland County Board of Commissioners and Four Lakes Task Force
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Harris v. Redwood et al
as 1:2024cv00306
Plaintiff:
James Harris
Defendant:
Warden Donald Redwood, Deputy Warden Cynthia Davis, Deputy Warden Nicole Joseph and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01316
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
DHARIA v. THE UNITED STATES et al
as 2:2024cv05915
Plaintiff:
RAJESH DHARIA
Defendant:
THE UNITED STATES, FBI, DAVID HADLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Victoria Tenisha Shanae Dillihunt v. Sean Paul et al
as 2:2024cv03602
Plaintiff:
Victoria Tenisha Shanae Dillihunt
Defendant:
Sean Paul, Troy Donald Jamerson, Ho Chi Mihn City and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv11187
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 203 Equal Pay Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03493
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Bush v. Oakland, County of et al
as 2:2024cv11143
Plaintiff:
Stephen Bush
Defendant:
Oakland, County of and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
