Cases 1 - 10 of 92
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01483
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Doe v. Wendy's of Bowling Green, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00764
Defendant:
Wendy's of Bowling Green, Inc.
Plaintiff:
John Doe, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kelly v. Advance Financial et al
as 3:2024cv00579
Plaintiff:
Henderson Kelly, Jr. and Basketball McDonalds ALL American and Ex-Felony
Defendant:
Advance Financial and Wendy's of Bowling Green
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Anderson v. Wendy's of Bowling Green Inc.
as 3:2024cv00500
Plaintiff:
Lonnita Anderson
Defendant:
Wendy's of Bowling Green Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-5368
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Sharp v. The Bowling Green Kentucky Police Department et al
as 1:2023cv00174
Plaintiff:
Robert Andrew Sharp, Jr.
Defendant:
The Bowling Green Kentucky Police Department, Stephen Irwin and Joshua Hughes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
Kalim Muhammad v. Wendy's of Bowling Green, Inc., et al
as 23-14126
Plaintiff:
KALIM A.R. MUHAMMAD
Defendant:
WENDY'S OF BOWLING GREEN, INC., COWIN KNOWLES, CIARA DENNIS and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00117
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Fishback v. Wilson et al
as 3:2023cv00019
Plaintiff:
Brian Fishback
Defendant:
Mike Wilson, Robert Stivers, David W. Osborne and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Muhammad et al v. Wendy's of Bowling Green, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv00020
Plaintiff:
Kalim A. R. Muhammad and Karima Lakssir Muhammad
Defendant:
Wendy's of Bowling Green, Inc., Cowin Knowles, Ciara Dennis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
