Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Johnson v. The Town of Pinckard et al
as 1:2023cv00433
Plaintiff:
James William Johnson
Defendant:
The Town of Pinckard, Pinckard Police Department and Adam Bruhn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Spriestersbach v. State of Hawaii
as 1:2021cv00456
Plaintiff:
Joshua Spriestersbach
Defendant:
State of Hawaii, City and County of Honolulu, Officer Abraham K. Bruhn and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00488
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e-2sx Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00018
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Stephen Lillo v. Darrell Bruhn, et al
as 12-14832
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEPHEN LILLO, as personal representative of the Estate of John R. Lillo, Jr.,
Defendant - Appellee:
DARRELL A BRUHN, MATTHEW M. HOLT, RICHARD S. BROWN and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv11549
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0794
Hayes et al v. Heineman et al.
as 4:2011cv03229
Plaintiff:
Matthew Adams, Eric J. Aho, Jr., Cynthia Alberico and others
Defendant:
Carlos Castillo, Dave Heineman, Shane Osborn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2011cv00234
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Emanuel Williams II et al v. County of Riverside et al
as 2:2009cv04291
Plaintiff:
Emanuel Williams, II, Rosemary Williams, E. W. and others
Defendant:
County of Riverside, Dein McCoy, Tracy Monroe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Type:
Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv12588
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.