Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Catherine Jones v. WMATA
as 23-7157
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Catherine Jones
Defendant / Appellee:
Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority
Kimberly Newman, et al v. Google, LLC, et al
as 23-16202
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KIMBERLY CARLESTE NEWMAN, LISA CABRERA, CATHERINE JONES and others
Defendant / Appellee:
GOOGLE, LLC and YOUTUBE, LLC
Defendant:
ALPHABET, INC.
Intervenor / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Jones v. Cleveland Clinic
as 1:2022cv01551
Plaintiff:
Catherine Jones
Defendant:
Cleveland Clinic and M.D. Brian Murphy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
JONES v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
as 1:2021cv01952
Plaintiff:
CATHERINE JONES
Defendant:
WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020at01019
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv01763
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Newman et al v. Google LLC et al
as 3:2020cv04011
Plaintiff:
Catherine Jones, Denotra Nicole Lewis, Lisa Cabrera and others
Defendant:
Alphabet Inc., YouTube LLC and Google LLC
Not Classified By Court:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Eggleston v. Bon Appetit Management Co. et al
as 4:2018cv00013
Plaintiff:
James Eggleston
Defendant:
Bon Appetit Management Co. , Catherine Jones , Catherine Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv03962
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00340
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Americans with Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
