Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv02593
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Bueno Zaragoza v. Lynch
as 2:2021cv02294
Plaintiff:
Ma Rosario Bueno Zaragoza and Estate of Luis Giovanny Aguilar
Defendant:
Jeffrey W. Lynch, Daniel Garland, Marcus Jordan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv07173
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv02051
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Charles Smith v. Kevwe Akpore, et al
as 16-3608
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
KEVWE AKPORE, Warden, JAMES M. CAROTHERS, Correectional Officer, STEPHEN DAMEWOOD, Correctional Officer and others
MCFARLANE v. CAROTHERS
as 4:2015cv00176
Defendant:
MIKE CAROTHERS
Plaintiff:
BRANDON MCFARLANE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones et al v. Tulare County et al
as 1:2015cv01779
Plaintiff:
Wendy Jones and William Fabricius
Defendant:
Tulare County, Tulare County Animal Control, Tulare County Sheriff's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones et al v. Tulare County et al
as 1:2015at00943
Plaintiff:
Wendy Jones and William Fabricius
Defendant:
Tulare County, tulare county animal Control, tulare county sheriff's office and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rodriguez-Diaz v. Hernandez et al
as 1:2015cv22048
Plaintiff:
Omar G. Rodriguez-Diaz
Defendant:
Mario Hernandez, III and Christopher Carothers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Omar Rodriguez-Diaz v. Christopher Carothers
as 15-12088
Plaintiff - Appellant:
OMAR G. RODRIGUEZ-DIAZ
Defendant - Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER CAROTHERS, Miami-Dade Police Officer
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
