Cases 1 - 10 of 10
TC the Confluence LP v. Cox et al
as 1:2022cv01124
Plaintiff:
TC the Confluence LP
Defendant:
Tristanna Cox and Charles Cox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
(UD) (PS) TC the Confluence LP v. Cox et al
as 2:2022cv01567
Plaintiff:
TC the Confluence LP
Defendant:
Tristanna Cox and Charles Cox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv01341
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1988
DONN et al v. CITY OF SPRINGFIELD FLORIDA et al
as 5:2015cv00238
Plaintiff:
ROBERT F DONN and ARTHUR DONN
Defendant:
CITY OF SPRINGFIELD FLORIDA and CHARLES COX
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McManus v. San Diego, County of et al
as 3:2015cv00138
Plaintiff:
Carlos McManus, Sr
Defendant:
San Diego, County of, San Diego, City of, Ernesto Luna and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Cox et al v. State of Washington, Department of Social and Health Services et al
as 3:2014cv05923
Plaintiff:
Charles Cox and Judith Cox
Defendant:
State of Washington, Department of Social and Health Services , Forest Jacobson , Rocky Stephenson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-1572
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2011cv00061
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Bond v. Cox et al
as 3:2011cv00057
Plaintiff:
Charles E Bond
Defendant:
Charles Cox, Dee Sandy and Miami County Commission Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pedler v. Miami County Ohio
as 3:2007cv00116
Plaintiff:
Barry Pedler and Barry Pedler
Defendant:
Miami County Ohio, Miami County Ohio, Charles Cox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
