Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Ball v. United States Department of Education et al
as 2:2022cv00954
Plaintiff:
Christopher Ball
Defendant:
United States Department of Education, Nelnet Inc, Transunion Intermediate Holding Company Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sanchez, et al v. Hill, et al
as 22-8035
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALFREDO GUILLERMO SANCHEZ, DAVID CHRISTOPHER BALL, "CHRIS" and SEAN MARX
Defendant / Appellee:
BRIDGET HILL, Wyoming Attorney General in her official capacity, MARK GORDON, Governo of Wyoming in his official capacity, MATT CARR, Sheriff of Teton County Wyoming, in his individual and official capacitties and others
Sanchez et al v. Hill et al
as 2:2022cv00047
Defendant:
Wyoming Attorney General, Wyoming Governor, Teton County Sheriff and others
Plaintiff:
Alfredo Guillermo Sanchez, David Christopher Ball, Chris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ball v. Wisconsin Department of Workforce Development et al
as 2:2022cv00068
Plaintiff:
Christopher Ball
Defendant:
Wisconsin Department of Workforce Development and Unemployment Insurance Division
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ball v. Landmark Credit Union
as 2:2022cv00069
Plaintiff:
Christopher Ball
Defendant:
Landmark Credit Union
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Quinn et al v. Board of Education of the City of Chicago et al
as 1:2016cv09514
Plaintiff:
Patrick Quinn , Irene Robinson , Antwain Miller and others
Defendant:
Board of Education of the City of Chicago , James Meeks , Steven Gilford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00759
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2010cv06382
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
