Cases 1 - 10 of 35
ARMSTRONG v. STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2024cv01978
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR O. ARMSTRONG
Defendant:
STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, SIRLIN GALLOGLY & LESSER, PC, BARBARA A. FEIN LAW OFFICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Andrew Anderson v. State of North Carolina
as 24-1277
Plaintiff:
ANDREW D. ANDERSON, an individual, an American, and Disabled Veteran of Sylva, NC; We the People; All similarly situated free Americans
Defendant:
THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, THE OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR OF NORTH CAROLINA, ROY A. COOPER, III, an individual, and Governor of North Carolina and others
Anderson v. The State of North Carolina et al
as 1:2024cv00034
Plaintiff:
Andrew D. Anderson
Defendant:
The State of North Carolina, The Office of the Governor of North Carolina, Roy Cooper, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dineen Etienne v. Machelle Sanders
as 24-1044
Plaintiff:
DINEEN CHERYLANN ETIENNE
Defendant:
MACHELLE SANDERS, Secretary, North Carolina Department of Administration; North Carolina Department of Commerce, TAMMIE ELAINE HALL, Division Executive Director, Historically Underutilized Businesses, BENNY SLOAN, DBW Certification Officer, North Carolina Department of Transportation and others
Clanton v. Douds et al
as 1:2023cv02681
Plaintiff:
Stanford Charles Clanton
Defendant:
Gregory T. Douds et al. Chief Associate Magistrate, et al. Heirs and Assignees Magistrate Court of Cherokee County doing business as Gregory T. Douds, Stanely C. Middleman et al., Chief Executive Officer, et al., Heirs and Assignees, Freedom Mortgage Corporation doing business as Stanely C. Middleman, Wes Hunt et al. Chief Executive Officer, et al. Heirs and Assignees Homestar Financial Corporation doing business as Hunt Wes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Clanton v. blinken et al
as 1:2023cv04284
Plaintiff:
Stanford Charles Clanton
Defendant:
antony john blinken secretary of state, et al. United States doing business as Antony John Blinken, janet louise yellen secretary of treasury, et al. United States doing business as Janet Louise Yellen, merrick garland attorney general, et al. United States doing business as Merrick Garland, et al. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Phillip Sanders v. JD Home Rentals, et al
as 23-15288
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PHILLIP SANDERS
Defendant / Appellee:
JD HOME RENTALS, LANCE ARMOR, Attorney for JD Home Rentals, R. LOPEZ, Warden, Deputy Clerk - Fresno Superior Court, Civil Limited Division and others
David Johnson, Sr. v. Urvashi Foster, et al
as 23-10452
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID TIMOTHY JOHNSON, SR.
Defendant / Appellee:
URVASHI FOSTER, BILLIE JOE FOSTER, DEPUTY BROOKS and others
Interested Party:
JUDGE HENRY L. BALKCOM, IV
Kenneth Brown, et al v. John Antony Blinken, et al
as 22-3459
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KENNETH ANDERSON BROWN, Moor Beneficiary
Plaintiff / Appellee:
KB RA-EL EXPRESS TRUST, A Private Moor Aboriginal Virginian National Subject Ambassador At Large and Noble of the Al Moroc Shereefian Empire
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN ANTONY BLINKEN, d/b/a Antony John Blinken, Secretary of State, JANET LOUISE YELLEN, d/b/a Janet Louise Yellen, Secretary of Treasury, et al United States Heirs and Assignees, MERRICK B. GARLAND, d/b/a Merrick Gardland, et al. Attorney General, et al, United States Heirs and Assignees and others
Debtor / Appellee:
RALPH BREEDEN, III, d/b/a Ralph Breeden III et al d/b/a GA Bar No 195892 attorney at law Hayt, Hayt & Landau, P.L. Heirs and Assignees
BROWN et al v. BLINKEN et al
as 2:2022cv04790
Plaintiff:
KENNETH ANDERSON BROWN and KB RA-EL EXPRESS TRUST
Defendant:
JOHN ANTONY BLINKEN D/B/A ANTONY JOHN BLINKEN, SECRETARY OF STATE, JANET LOUISE YELLEN d/b/a JANET LOUISE YELLEN secretary of treasury, et al. United States HEIRS AND ASSIGNEES, MERRICK GARLAND d/b/a MERRICK GARLAND, et al. attorney general, et al. United States HEIRS AND ASSIGNEES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
