Cases 1 - 10 of 10
TORNILLO et al v. PAITAKIS et al
as 3:2023cv22629
Plaintiff:
KALINA TORNILLO, MICHAEL TORNILLO and CHILD TORNILLO
Defendant:
JOHN PAITAKIS, YANNI PAITAKIS, BENJAMIN SILKOWITZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Culumber v. Morris Network of Mississippi, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00219
Plaintiff:
Toni Miles Culumber
Defendant:
Morris Network of Mississippi, Inc. doing business as WXXV-TV, Morris Multimedia, Morris Network, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Sex Discrimination
KENNEDY v. GETTYSBURG COLLEGE et al
as 2:2018cv04488
Defendant:
PHI SIGMA KAPPA FRATERNITY, GETTYSBURG COLLEGE, PHI SIGMA KAPPA DRUID ALUMNI ASSOCIATION and others
Plaintiff:
KELSI KENNEDY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv12842
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv11439
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
FLORES v. HUDSON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2017cv00441
Plaintiff:
JASON FLORES
Defendant:
HUDSON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, COUNTY OF HUDSON, STATE OF NEW JERSEY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv07082
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv02229
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv00991
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Knappenberger v. City of Phoenix, et al
as 07-15774
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRUCE KNAPPENBERGER, an individual
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF PHOENIX, a political subdivision in the State of Arizona, DOES I-X and CORPORATIONS A-Z
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
