Cases 1 - 10 of 82
White v. Mills et al
as 4:2024cv00427
Plaintiff:
John D. White
Defendant:
Dee Ann Mills and Danielle Parsons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-5040
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Shaw v. Town of Mint Hill et al
as 3:2023cv00624
Plaintiff:
Willie "Will" Shaw
Defendant:
Town of Mint Hill, Errol J. Wedra, Jr., Marnee R. Moberg and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
White v. Klein et al
as 1:2023cv06924
Cross Defendant:
Adam D White, NYPD Sergeant Leighton Barrett, NYPD Sergeant Kurt Klenke and others
Cross Claimant:
Sholem Klein
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
White v. City of Tulsa et al
as 4:2023cv00276
Plaintiff:
Edward D White
Defendant:
City of Tulsa and Tulsa Police Dept.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Marble v. Forrest General Hospital et al
as 2:2023cv00074
Plaintiff:
Salinas Marble
Defendant:
Forrest General Hospital, Dr. John Doe, Nurse Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Robbie White v. City of West Sacramento, et al
as 23-15395
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBBIE D. WHITE
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO, COUNTY OF YOLO, DAVID SANTOS and others
Defendant:
CITY AND COUNTY OF WEST SACRAMENTO, FORTIER, individually and in his official capacity as a West Sacramento Police Dept. Officer, JASON MAHAFFEY, Officer and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-5019
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Stafford v. Sugarcreek Township et al
as 3:2022cv00136
Plaintiff:
John E. Stafford
Defendant:
Sugarcreek Township, Sugarcreek Township Police Department, Chief Michael Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
D. v. Wexford Health Sources Inc
as 1:2022cv01856
Plaintiff:
D White-Peck
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
