Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01056
Not Yet Classified:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Pierce v. Ryder et al
as 1:2021cv03482
Defendant:
NEW YORK CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT OFFICER SAID, THE CITY OF NEW YORK, NEW YORK CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT OFFICER DANIELLE MOSES and others
Plaintiff:
Brigid Pierce
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Parmley
as 16-3603
Plaintiff:
Sheila Ninham Fish Coleman, Joseph Coleman as Administrator of Estate, agent of Joseph Coleman, Gabrielle Misener, Marissa Horton, AKA Marissa Hunt and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Nadine O'Field / Ganonhweih, FKA Nadine Bucktooth
Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant - Appellant:
Andrew Jones, Robert E. Bucktooth, Jr., Cheryl Bucktooth and others
Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant:
Stonehorse Goeman, Marie Peters, Wealthy Bucktooth, Individually and others
Defendant - Appellee:
James J. Parmley, George Beach, Pamela J. Morris and others
Defendant:
James W. McMahon, Superintendent of New York State Police, in his official and personal capacity, County of Onondaga, Onondaga County Sheriff's Department and others
Scott v. Redus et al
as 5:2010cv00138
Plaintiff:
Walter Scott, Jr
Defendant:
Carl Redus, Pine Bluff Arkansas, City of, Daniel Moses and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kelven Hadley v. City of Pine Bluff, Arkansas, et al
as 10-1341
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Kelven Hadley
Defendant - Appellant:
City of Pine Bluff, Arkansas
Defendant:
Carl A. Redus, Jr., In his official capacity as Mayor for the City of Pine Bluff, Arkansas, Daniel Moses, In his individual and official capacity as Chief of Police for the Pine Bluff Police Department, Archie Sanders, In his official capacity as member of the Pine Bluff Civil Service Commission and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
