Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Sivels v. Ramsey County et al
as 0:2023cv00894
Plaintiff:
Danielle Sivels
Defendant:
Ramsey County, Ramsey County Sheriff's Office, Inmate Services, Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 18-50298
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00812
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Wilson v. Kalelkar et al
as 1:2014cv10521
Plaintiff:
Robert Lance Wilson
Defendant:
Mitra B Kalelkar, Edmund R Donoghue, Office of the Cook County Medical Examiner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jordan et al v. Premier Entertainment Biloxi, LLC et al
as 1:2013cv00195
Plaintiff:
Jason Jordan , Alyssa Jordan and Christopher Soukup
Defendant:
Premier Entertainment Biloxi, LLC , The City of Biloxi, Mississippi , Doe Defendant One and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Smith et al v. Carver et al
as 3:2012cv00385
Plaintiff:
Samuel Smith, Jr. and Prentiss Smith
Defendant:
Jerry Carver , Carroll County, Mississippi , Gordon Ward and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reyna v. Independent School Dist. No. 1, et al
as 12-6084
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANA REYNA, individually and as mother and next friend of K.M.R., a minor
Defendant - Appellee:
INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT NUMBER 1 OF OKLAHOMA COUNTY, commonly referred to as Putnam City Schools, PAUL HURST, MELANIE MOUSE and others
Reyna et al v. Independent School District No 1 of Oklahoma County Oklahoma et al
as 5:2009cv01223
Plaintiff:
Dana Reyna and Dana Reyna
Defendant:
Independent School District No 1 of Oklahoma County Oklahoma, Paul Hurst, Melanie Mouse and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
