Cases 1 - 10 of 81
Smith v. City of North Branch, Minnesota
as 0:2024cv01868
Plaintiff:
Eric Smith
Defendant:
City of North Branch, Minnesota
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Moliere Dimanche, Jr. v. Takela Jackson, et al
as 24-11267
Plaintiff:
MOLIERE DIMANCHE, JR.
Defendant:
TAKELA JACKSON, RABIH TABBARA, NICOLAS LUCIANO MONTES and others
Smith v. City of North Branch
as 1:2024cv00043
Plaintiff:
Eric Smith
Defendant:
City of North Branch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00356
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Smith v. City of Yankton et al
as 4:2023cv04174
Petitioner:
Eric Smith
Respondent:
City of Yankton, State of South Dakota, First Judicial Circuit Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Women in Struggle et al v. Bain et al
as 6:2023cv01887
Plaintiff:
Women in Struggle, Melinda Butterfield, Christynne Wood and others
Defendant:
Andrew Bain, Eric Smith, Kevin Edmonds and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Knight et al v. The Ohio State University
as 2:2023cv02994
Plaintiff:
William Knight, Eric Smith, Mark Coleman and others
Defendant:
The Ohio State University
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Smith v. City of Duluth et al
as 0:2023cv02196
Plaintiff:
Eric Smith
Defendant:
City of Duluth, Rebecca St. George, Chad Guenther and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-12047
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Smith v. Neo et al
as 0:2023cv01574
Plaintiff:
Eric Smith
Defendant:
Theresa Neo and St. Louis, County of Minnesota
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
