Cases 1 - 10 of 84
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv09839
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv03018
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Raghunath v. State of New York et, al et al
as 1:2023cv04622
Plaintiff:
Ishwardat Raghunath
Defendant:
State of New York et, al, City of New York, et al, County of Queens, et al and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00593
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Braziel-Lee v. Niagara Falls Police Depart. et al
as 1:2023cv00520
Plaintiff:
Charifa M. Braziel-Lee
Defendant:
Niagara Falls Police Depart., Joel Smith, Niagara Fallls Memorial Medical Ct. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Shaikh v. County of Mobile/Mobile County Commission(ers) et al
as 1:2023cv00196
Plaintiff:
Ilyas Ahmed Shaikh
Defendant:
County of Mobile/Mobile County Commission(ers), City Of Mobile, Thaddeus Hoyt, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JOHNSON v. BSO et al
as 0:2023cv60150
Plaintiff:
ASHLEY JOHNSON
Defendant:
BSO, SGT RAFAEL HERNANDEZ and OFFIC ER STEVEN DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Mist Doe v. Foe Ers
as 23-55049
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MIST ER DOE
Defendant / Appellee:
FOE DOE GRAPH ERS, Marshall, individual and official capacity
Mist Er Doe v. Foe Doe Graph Ers
as 2:2023cv00019
Plaintiff:
Mist Er Doe and PMB-
Defendant:
Foe Doe Graph Ers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00231
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disability Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
