Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Leaf v. Marriot International, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv11288
Plaintiff:
Martin H. Leaf
Defendant:
Marriot International, Inc., Hamilton Hospitality, Inc., GROUP 10 MANAGEMENT COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv04789
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
CALDERON LOPEZ v. JOHNSON et al
as 1:2018cv01451
Defendant:
JEFFREY ADKINS, LISA NESBITT, HOPE SWANN and others
Plaintiff:
RICARDO JOSE CALDERON LOPEZ and RICARDO JOSE CALDERON LOPEZ doing business as STARLIGHT CONSULTING SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JAMES v. ROBERTS et al
as 2:2013cv06584
Plaintiff:
SAM H. JAMES, JR.
Defendant:
JOHN G. ROBERTS, ANTONIN SCALIA, ANTHONY M. KENNEDY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv04067
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Jones v. Pryor et al
as 3:2010cv02750
Plaintiff:
Donald G. Jones
Defendant:
William H. Pryor, Ed Carnes, Alan J. Baverman and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
JONES v. UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT et al
as 1:2010cv00910
Plaintiff:
DONALD G. JONES
Defendant:
UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT, WILLIAM K. SUTER, GAIL JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 09-10667
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
JOHNSON v. SUTER et al
as 1:2009cv00977
Plaintiff:
JESSIE JOHNSON
Defendant:
WILLIAM K. SUTER, GAIL JOHNSON and SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2009cv00182
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
