Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Jaye v. United States et al (MAG +)
as 1:2022cv05328
Defendant:
KNUCKLES, KOMOSINSKI & MANFRO, LLP, BERMAN, SAUTER, RECORD & JARDIM, PC, Kemeny, Ramp & Renaud, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Chris Jaye
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jaye v. United States et al (MAG +)
as 2:2022cv00376
Plaintiff:
Chris Jaye
Defendant:
United States, Merrick B. Garland, John G. Roberts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HUNTER v. JONES et al
as 1:2018cv00220
Defendant:
JESSICA J LYUBLANOVITS and GARY R JONES
Plaintiff:
SUSAN MARIE HUNTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WEXLER v. STATE OF FLORIDA et al.
as 1:2017cv00284
Plaintiff:
IRA HAROLD WEXLER
Defendant:
STATE OF FLORIDA, ST. JOHNS COUNTY, SADIE DARNELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wexler v. State of Florida et al
as 3:2017cv01221
Plaintiff:
Ira Harold Wexler
Defendant:
State of Florida, St. Johns County, Sadie Darnell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-14013
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cody Walton v. Robert Dawson, et al
as 12-4039
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Cody Lee Walton
Defendant:
Robert Dawson, Jon Dwiggins, Nathaniel Eugene Flennory and others
Defendant - Appellee:
David Moore
Cody Walton v. Robert Dawson, et al
as 12-4000
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Cody Lee Walton
Defendant - Appellant:
Robert Dawson and David Moore
Defendant:
Jon Dwiggins, Nathaniel Eugene Flennory, Drew Belt and others
Scott v. Moore et al
as 2:2012cv00031
Defendant:
David Moore, Robert Dawson, Michael Shively and others
Plaintiff:
Adam James Scott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scott v. Moore et al
as 4:2012cv00653
Defendant:
David Moore, Robert Dawson, Michael Shively and others
Plaintiff:
Adam James Scott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
