Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Whaley v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Clinton County, PA et al
as 4:2022cv01348
Plaintiff:
George Henry Whaley, Jr.
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Clinton County, PA, Pine Creek Township Police Department, Police Officer Jared Mahosky and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01234
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Civil Rights: Other
Velez v. Cuomo et al
as 1:2020cv01584
Plaintiff:
Bianca Velez
Defendant:
Governor Jay Inslee, Andrew Cuomo, Tony Evers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
ACOSTA v. WOLF et al
as 2:2020cv05541
Plaintiff:
ORLANDO A. ACOSTA
Defendant:
GOVERNOR TOM WOLF, PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMET OF STATE BUREAU OF ELECTIONS and KATHY BOOCKVAR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ACOSTA v. WOLF et al
as 2:2020cv02528
Plaintiff:
ORLANDO A. ACOSTA
Defendant:
GOVERNOR TOM WOLF and OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF STATE KATHY BOOCKV
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LIBERTARIAN PARTY OF PENNSYLVANIA et al v. BOOCKVAR et al
as 2:2020cv02299
Plaintiff:
GREEN PARTY OF PENNSYLVANIA, ALAN SMITH, TIMOTHY RUNKLE and others
Lead Plaintiff:
LIBERTARIAN PARTY OF PENNSYLVANIA
Defendant:
SECRETARY KATHY BOOCKVAR, DEPUTY SECRETARY JONATHAN M. MARKS and GOVERNOR TOM WOLF
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DUBE v. THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2019cv04276
Defendant:
THE SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PHILADELPHIA LAW DEPARTMENT, JOE TORSELLA, GOVERNOR TOM WOLFE and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES E. DUBE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Liviz Sr. v. Baker et al
as 1:2019cv10304
Defendant:
Governor Charlie Baker, Governor Phil Bryant, Governor Henry McMaster and others
Plaintiff:
Chief Jurist Ilya Liviz Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Monighan v. Wolf
as 1:2018cv01654
Plaintiff:
Joshua A Monighan
Defendant:
Governor Tom Wolf
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
