Cases 1 - 8 of 8
SHARP v. DOLAN et al
as 1:2022cv02063
Plaintiff:
DARYL SHARP
Defendant:
TIMOTHY DOLAN, CHRISTOPHE PIERRE, JOSE HORACIO GOMEZ VELASCO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
SHARP v. DOLAN et al
as 1:2022cv01616
Plaintiff:
DARYL SHARP
Defendant:
TIMOTHY DOLAN, CHRISTOPHE PIERRE, JOSE HORACIO GOMEZ VELASCO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Daryl Sharp v. Timothy Dolan, et al
as 22-7078
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Daryl Sharp, Ambassador and Representative of the Living God Jehovah
Defendant / Appellee:
Timothy J. Dolan, Archbishop of New York, Christophe Pierre, Apostolic Nuncio Vatican Embassy, Jose Horacio Gomez Velasco, Archbishop of Los Angeles, President of the USCCB and others
SHARP v. DOLAN et al
as 1:2022cv01016
Plaintiff:
DARYL SHARP
Defendant:
TIMOTHY DOLAN, CHRISTOPHE PIERRE, JOSE OSCAR VELASCO GARCIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv06450
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2014cv01716
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003
Jeffrey Barnes, et al v. Franklin American Mortgage, et al
as 11-6475
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEFFREY MARK BARNES, Barnes Sherill and LISA DEBLOIS BARNES
Plaintiff:
GREGORY LAWRENCE BARNES, Barnes Sherill
Defendant:
FRANKLIN AMERICAN MORTGAGE, WELLS FARGO HOME MORTGAGE, ELECRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS and others
Barnes et al v. Franklin American Mortgage Company et al
as 1:2011cv00349
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Mark Barnes, Lisa Deblois Barnes and Gregory Lawrence Barnes
Defendant:
Franklin American Mortgage Company, Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Electronic Registration Systems and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
