Cases 1 - 10 of 932
Stein v. Howell et al
as 3:2024cv00166
Plaintiff:
Samuel Stein
Defendant:
Officer Rodney N Howell, Officer Ashley Henschen, Officer Alec Sparkman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cody, II v. Howell et al
as 1:2024cv00927
Plaintiff:
Jonathan L. Cody, II
Defendant:
Marc S. Howell, Stephen Marte, Even McKenna and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Palmer v. City of Daytona Beach et al
as 6:2024cv00989
Plaintiff:
Keriekan Palmer
Defendant:
City of Daytona Beach, Travis Barrett, Collin Howell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Viloria v. City Of New York et al
as 1:2024cv03456
Plaintiff:
Justin Viloria
Defendant:
City Of New York, Arhenis Lopezestevez, Philip Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00227
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01689
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Howell v. Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority, et al
as 24-1368
Plaintiff:
CURTIS L. HOWELL
Defendant:
MASSACHUSETTS BAY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY, MICHELLE WU and BOSTON POLICE DEPARTMENT
Howell v. Pine Street Inn, et al
as 24-1369
Plaintiff:
CURTIS L. HOWELL
Defendant:
PINE STREET INN, MICHELLE WU and BOSTON POLICE DEPARTMENT
Howell v. Department of Justice, et al
as 24-1374
Plaintiff:
CURTIS L. HOWELL
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and others
Howell v. Watertown Public Library, et al
as 24-1370
Plaintiff:
CURTIS L. HOWELL
Defendant:
WATERTOWN PUBLIC LIBRARY and WATERTOWN POLICE DEPARTMENT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
