Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv08553
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Watkins v. Hale
as 3:2023cv00126
Plaintiff:
GeneDeShawn M. Watkins
Defendant:
Judge David J. Hale
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Bueno, Jr. v. Nigrini et al
as 3:2023cv00311
Plaintiff:
Victor Bueno, Jr.
Defendant:
Jay M. Nigrini, J. Hale, Schuylkill County Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hicks v. Hale et al
as 3:2022cv00516
Plaintiff:
Joseph Hicks
Defendant:
Judge David J. Hale, Judge Benjamin Beaton, Judge Claria Horn Boom and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Clervrain et al v. Walker et al
as 2:2022cv00511
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain, Fabrice Thomas, Emmanuel Benjoassint and others
Defendant:
Mark Walker, Sandra Watson, Ken Burns and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Atkins v. Stivers et al
as 3:2021cv00470
Plaintiff:
Rebekah A. Atkins
Defendant:
Chief District Judge Greg N. Stivers, District Judge David J. Hale, District Judge Claria H. Boom and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lawrence v. United States District Court et al
as 3:2016cv00131
Plaintiff:
Marcus J. Lawrence, SR
Defendant:
United States District Court, Greg N. Stivers, Thomas B. Russell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gripp v. Hale
as 3:2016cv00022
Plaintiff:
David M. Gripp
Defendant:
David J. Hale
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Yisra'EL v. §Commonwealth of Virginia et al
as 4:2013cv00147
Plaintiff:
Yahmassiach Ben Levi Yisra'EL
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Virginia, Louis R. Lerner, E. Preston Grissom and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv01013
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0794
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
