Cases 1 - 10 of 105
Estate of Jaquyn O'Neill Light v. Marcus Pollock
as 24-1473
Plaintiff:
ESTATE OF JAQUYN O'NEILL LIGHT, by and through James Hunt Johnson, Administrator
Defendant:
MARCUS POLLOCK, in his individual and official capacities, JEFF PRITCHARD, in his official capacities and CITY OF GRAHAM, a political subdivision of the State of North Carolina
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01931
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1381
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00789
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Johnson v. Reyna et.al.
as 3:2024cv01004
Plaintiff:
Mr. James Johnson and Mr. James C Johnson
Defendant:
Renee C. Reyna and San Mateo County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00711
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00092
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
TATUM v. BIDEN et al
as 1:2024cv00033
Plaintiff:
THOMAS TATUM
Defendant:
JOSEPH BIDEN, METROPOLITAN POLICE, DANIEL THAU and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
VARGO v. WILLIAMS et al
as 1:2024cv00010
Plaintiff:
DERRICK VARGO
Defendant:
BRYANT WILLIAMS and JAMES MICHAEL JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
WHITE v. BAGSHAW et al
as 1:2024cv00018
Plaintiff:
VICTORIA CHARITY WHITE
Defendant:
JASON BAGSHAW, NEIL MCALLISTER and JAMES MICHAEL JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
