Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Manning v. Richardson et al
as 3:2023cv00139
Plaintiff:
Michael Todd Manning
Defendant:
Cindy LuAnn Richardson, Sandra Lowburg, Susan Orr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Manning v. Richardson et al
as 3:2023cv00084
Plaintiff:
Michael Todd Manning
Defendant:
Cindy LuAnn Richardson, Sandra Lowburg, Susan Orr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Manning v. Richardson et al
as 3:2022cv00305
Plaintiff:
Michael Todd Manning
Defendant:
Cindy LuAnn Richardson, Sandra Lowburg, Susan Orr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Manning v. Richardson et al
as 3:2022cv00284
Plaintiff:
Michael Todd Manning
Defendant:
Cindy LuAnn Richardson, Sandra Lowburg, Susan Orr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Clervrain et al v. Anderson et al
as 1:2022cv00007
Plaintiff:
Manetiony Clervrain, Fabrice Thomas, Evans Delva and others
Defendant:
S. Thomas Anderson, Joann Garcia Camacho, Melanie Mendiola and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hamrick v. Hutchinson et al
as 4:2020cv00486
Defendant:
John Pollard, Laura Ballentine, Clayton Higgins and others
Plaintiff:
Don Hamrick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daniel Cantu v. James Moody, et al
as 18-40434
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL ENRIQUE CANTU
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES M. MOODY, ERIN S. LABUZ, also known as Erin S. Hayne, NATHAN HUSAK and others
Smith v. Holmes et al
as 4:2016cv00176
Plaintiff:
Wardell Smith
Defendant:
Kristine G Baker, James M Moody, Jr, Jerry W Cavaneau and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cantu v. Moody et al
as 7:2015cv00354
Plaintiff:
Daniel Enrique Cantu
Defendant:
James M Moody, Erin S Labuz, Nathan Husak and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Brooks v. Beebe et al
as 4:2014cv00023
Plaintiff:
Dwight Ellis Brooks
Defendant:
Mike Beebe and James M Moody
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
