Cases 1 - 9 of 9
BELFI v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2023cv03062
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER BELFI
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, USA ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT INC.,(USAEMI), FH DEMOLITION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Thompson v. Pierce Automotive, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv00027
Plaintiff:
Stacy Thompson
Defendant:
Pierce Automotive, Inc. doing business as Toyota of Hattiesburg, Jake Bolton, Alton Pierce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00316
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00101
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ahad v. Lee et al
as 4:2016cv03958
Plaintiff:
Bahaadur Aalim Abd 'ul' Ahad
Defendant:
Rob Lee, Chesterfield County Sheriff's Office, Chesterfield County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Louise Heard v. James Sander
as 14-2699
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Louise Heard
Defendant:
Mississippi County Sheriff's Department and John Doe, Persons on Duty acting as Baliffs, Deptuies & Jailers for Mississippe Cty Sheriff Dept; Other Does acting as Baliffs in Mississippi Cty Circuit Court, Osceola
Defendant - Appellee:
James Sanders, Individually and on Behalf as Sheriff of Mississippi County
Lucas v. City of New York et al
as 1:2014cv02751
Plaintiff:
N. John Lucas
Defendant:
City of New York, New York City Department of Transportation, John Doe Corporation 1 through 10 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-2960
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Thomas v. City of Greenville et al
as 4:2013cv00028
Plaintiff:
Caleb Thomas
Defendant:
City of Greenville , Jed Jones and John Doe Persons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.