Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Kamath v. Alsup et al
as 5:2023cv06494
Plaintiff:
Reshma Kamath
Defendant:
William Haskell Alsup, Thomas Hixson, Yvonne Gonzalez-Rogers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Reshma Kamath v. Judith Ashmann Gerst et al
as 8:2023cv02193
Plaintiff:
PLAINTIFF'S COU RESHMA KAMATH and Reshma Kamath
Defendant:
Elwood Lui, Marie Stratton, Judith Ashmann-Gerst and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Reshma Kamath v. The Superior Court of California County of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2023cv08979
Plaintiff:
PLAINTIFF'S COU RESHMA KAMATH and Reshma Kamath
Defendant:
The Superior Court of California County of Los Angeles, WILLIAM D. STEWART, MICHAEL SCHULTZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kamath v. United States Department of Homeland Security et al
as 3:2023cv03531
Plaintiff:
RESHMA KAMATH
Defendant:
United States Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco Police Department and Federal Protective Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kamath v. Barmann, Jr. et al
as 1:2023cv00461
Plaintiff:
Reshma Kamath
Defendant:
Bernard C. Barmann, Jr., Deputy Sheriff, Eric Bradshaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kamath v. Batson et al
as 3:2019cv00265
Plaintiff:
Nitin Kamath
Defendant:
City of Baton Rouge-Parish of East Baton Rouge, Maimuna D. Magee and Lea Anne Batson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-2331
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv02150
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
MONTGOMERY v. MCNEIL
as 4:2009cv00034
Plaintiff:
DALE MONTGOMERY
Defendant:
WALTER MCNEIL, ODOM, H HERCULE and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
