Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Pointer et al v. Phelps et al
as 7:2026cv00476
Plaintiff:
Rihanna Pointer, Grant Sturdivant, Timoni Taite and others
Defendant:
Scott Phelps, Mike Brock, Karen Brooks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sutton et al v. Federation of State Medical Boards et al
as 3:2025cv02936
Plaintiff:
Mark Sutton, John Humiston, Mary Bowden and others
Defendant:
Federation of State Medical Boards, Katie Templeton, Kenneth Simons and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Sutton et al v. Federation of State Medical Boards et al
as 4:2025cv01230
Plaintiff:
Mark Sutton, John Humiston, Mary Bowden and others
Defendant:
Federation of State Medical Boards, Katie Templeton, Kenneth Simons and others
Pretrial Service:
ADR Provider
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Timothy Joyce v. City of Pittsburgh, et al
as 14-2089
Plaintiff - Appellee:
TIMOTHY M. JOYCE
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF PITTSBURGH
Defendant - Appellant:
CITY OF PITTSBURGH POLICE OFFICER KENNETH SIMON and ANTHONY SCARPINE, CITY OF PITTSBURGH POLICE OFFICER, INDIVIDUALLY AND IN THEIR OFFICIAL CAPACITY
David Carpenter v. City of Pittsburgh, et al
as 14-2088
Plaintiff - Appellee:
DAVID CARPENTER
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF PITTSBURGH
Defendant - Appellant:
CITY OF PITTSBURGH POLICE OFFICER KENNETH SIMON and ANTHONY SCARPINE
CARPENTER v. CITY OF PITTSBURGH et al
as 2:2012cv00653
Plaintiff:
DAVID CARPENTER
Defendant:
CITY OF PITTSBURGH , CITY OF PITTSBURGH POLICE OFFICER KENNETH SIMON and CITY OF PITTSBURGH POLICE OFFICER ANTHONY SCARPINE
Cross_claimant:
CITY OF PITTSBURGH POLICE OFFICER ANTHONY SCARPINE
Cross_defendant:
CITY OF PITTSBURGH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOYCE v. CITY OF PITTSBURGH et al
as 2:2012cv00334
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY M. JOYCE
Defendant:
CITY OF PITTSBURGH , KENNETH SIMON and ANTHONY SCARPINE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
