Cases 1 - 10 of 12
ACADEMY HILL, INC et al v. CITY OF LAMBERTVILLE et al
as 3:2021cv11979
Defendant:
Michael Jingoli, JULIA TAYLOR, KENNETH ROGERS and others
Plaintiff:
ACADEMY HILL, INC. and MERRICK WILSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Academy Hill, Inc et al v. CITY OF LAMBERTVILLE et al
as 2:2021cv01966
Defendant:
Michael Jingoli, JULIA TAYLOR, KENNETH ROGERS and others
Plaintiff:
Academy Hill, Inc and Merrick Wilson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Academy Hill, Inc et al v. CITY OF LAMBERTVILLE, N.J. et al
as 2:2021cv01920
Defendant:
Michael Jingoli, CITY OF LAMBERTVILLE, Kenneth Rogers and others
Plaintiff:
Academy Hill, Inc and Merrick Wilson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv14670
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv02030
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
ACADEMY HILL, INC. et al v. CITY OF LAMBERTVILLE et al
as 3:2013cv05182
Plaintiff:
ACADEMY HILL, INC. and MERRICK WILSON
Defendant:
CITY OF LAMBERTVILLE , DAVID DELVECCHIO , CITY COUNSEL OF THE CITY OF LAMBERTVILLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lawrence Earl v. Kevin Ballew, et al
as 10-5052
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LAWRENCE EARL
Defendant - Appellee:
KEVIN BALLEW, PHIL BREDESEN, DAVID MITCHELL and others
Lawrence Earl v. Kevin Ballew, et al
as 09-6082
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LAWRENCE EARL
Defendant - Appellee:
KEVIN BALLEW, PHIL BREDESEN, DAVID MITCHELL and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv00682
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Lawrence Earl v. Kevin Ballew, et al
as 09-5093
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LAWRENCE EARL
Defendant - Appellee:
KEVIN BALLEW, PHIL BREDESEN, DAVID MITCHELL and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
