Cases 1 - 9 of 9
- TRANSFERRED TO CAMDEN NEW CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:24-cv-03131
as 3:2024cv03131
Defendant:
MONMOUTH MEDICAL CENTER SOUTHERN CAMPUS, COOPERMAN BARNABAS MEDICAL CENTER, TOWNSHIP OF LAKEWOOD and others
Plaintiff:
SHIMON SHENKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Oseguera v. Oller et al
as 1:2021cv01410
Plaintiff:
Javier Oseguera
Defendant:
Sergeant Quint P Oller, Officer Jonathan C Adamson, Officer Kevin E Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kevin Douglas Martin v. Laura K. Furgione et al
as 5:2013cv01648
Defendant:
Laura K Furgione and National Weather Service
Plaintiff:
Kevin Douglas Martin
Felix et al v. City of New York et al
as 1:2013cv02941
Plaintiff:
Maurosol Felix , Danilo Melendez , Abraham Collins and others
Defendant:
City of New York , Raymond W. Kelly , Russell J. Green and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00215
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Jennings v. Martin et al
as 3:2012cv02368
Plaintiff:
Darla Jennings
Defendant:
Kevin J Martin, City of Lima, Nathan Garlock and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Muhammad v. Jackson et al
as 2:2008cv00369
Plaintiff:
Elijah Muhammad
Defendant:
Jessie Jackson, Jessie Jackson, Jr, Rainbow Push Coalition and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv02187
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Nair v. EMH Regional Medical Center et al
as 1:2007cv01209
Plaintiff:
Sivaramakrishnan S. Nair and Sivaramakrishnan S. Nair
Defendant:
EMH Regional Medical Center, EMH Regional Medical Center, EMH Regional Medical Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
