Cases 1 - 10 of 10
MAYERS v. MARION SUPERIOR COURT
as 1:2022cv00128
Plaintiff:
TANISHA MAYERS
Defendant:
CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS, PAIGE BOVA KERVAN, CHRITINE KERL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
SAUERS v. OAK PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LP. et al
as 2:2019cv01429
Defendant:
OAK PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LP., KEVIN RILEY, BUILDERS COUNTY and others
Plaintiff:
PETER SAUERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Novak v. City of Parma et al
as 1:2017cv02148
Defendant:
City of Parma , Kevin Riley , Thomas Connor and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Novak
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Novak v. City of Parma et al
as 1:2016cv02325
Defendant:
City of Parma , Timothy Dobeck , Kevin Riley and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Novak
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Howard v. Riley et al
as 1:2013cv01231
Plaintiff:
Tiffany Howard
Defendant:
Kevin Riley , City of Normal and Advantage Auto Sales
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Charles Austin v. Redford Township Police Depart, et al
as 11-2319
Plaintiff - Appellee:
CHARLES FITZGERALD AUSTIN
Defendant:
REDFORD TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT
Defendant - Appellant:
KEVIN RILEY, TIMOTHY L. PAULL and JOHN M. MORGAN
RILEY v. CAMDEN & GLOUCESTER COUNTY et al
as 1:2010cv02935
Plaintiff:
KEVIN RILEY
Defendant:
CAMDEN & GLOUCESTER COUNTY, CAMDEN & GLOUCESTER COUNTY CHILD SUPPORT DEPARTMENTS and JOHN OR JANE DOE CHILD SUPPORT DEPARTMENT EMPLOYEES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00266
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv07344
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv01248
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
