Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Barron v. Komar
as 1:2023cv01110
Plaintiff:
Jessica Barron
Defendant:
Gail Komar d/b/a Gail's Tobaco and Gas Outlet and Gail Komar doing business as Gail's Tobaco and Gas Outlet
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00428
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 American Disabilities Act
Vanloan et al v. The Nation of Islam et al
as 3:2022cv00787
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Vanloan
Defendant:
The Nation of Islam, Louis Farrafhan, Tony Muhammad and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 cv Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02331
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
VANLOAN v. THE NATION OF ISLAM et al
as 2:2021cv02559
Defendant:
POLICE CHIEF DAVID NISLEIT, MAIN LINE HEALTH SYSTEM, INC., RICHARD ORLOW and others
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN VANLOAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv02251
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 cv
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv01284
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Project Sentinel, Inc. v. Komar et al
as 1:2019at00380
Defendant:
Jeanette Komar, Meyer Komar and Sarah Komar
Plaintiff:
Project Sentinel, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Project Sentinel v. Komar et al
as 1:2019cv00708
Defendant:
Jeanette Komar, Meyer Komar and Sarah Komar
Plaintiff:
Project Sentinel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
HAYMAKER v. CITY OF JOHNSTOWN et al
as 3:2018cv00203
Plaintiff:
SCOTT HAYMAKER
Defendant:
CITY OF JOHNSTOWN, MELISSA KOMAR and CRAIG FOUST
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
