Cases 1 - 10 of 150
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00720
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Konecny v. Boulder Community Health, et al
as 24-1082
Plaintiff:
J. ALAN KONECNY, AKA Alan J. Konecny
Defendant:
BOULDER COMMUNITY HEALTH, ROBERT VISSERS, JASON ROZESKI and others
Konecny (PS) v. Boulder Community Health et al
as 1:2023cv03047
Plaintiff:
J. Alan Konecny
Defendant:
Boulder Community Health, Robert Vissers, Jason Rozeski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Warner v. Lund, et al
as 23-2187
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID WARNER
Defendant / Appellee:
KATIE G. LUND, LISA ABEYTA, ANDRE BILLINGSLEY and others
Cloninger v. The Original Case Worker et al
as 3:2023cv00109
Plaintiff:
Sam Cloninger
Defendant:
The Original Case Worker, Sidney K. Billingslea, William F. Morse and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Martin v. State of Utah, et al
as 23-4045
Plaintiff / Appellant:
C. MICHAEL MARTIN
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF UTAH, BRITTEN LUND, KIM DIMOND-SMITH and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv05826
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Spirit Lake Tribe et al v. Benson County, North Dakota et al
as 3:2022cv00161
Plaintiff:
Spirit Lake Tribe, Collette Brown and Lois Leben
Defendant:
Benson County, North Dakota, Benson County Board of Commissioners, David Davison and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Other Civil Rights
Warner v. Lund et al
as 2:2022cv00544
Plaintiff:
David Warner
Defendant:
Katie G. Lund, Lisa Abeyta and Andre Billingsley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00267
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
