Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03373
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
RAYNOR v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2022cv01580
Plaintiff:
EARL RAYNOR
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, CONTROLLER REBECCA RHYNHART, DEPUTY CITY SOLICITOR JON MICHAEL OLSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Olson et al v. Sposato
as 2:2016cv05710
Plaintiff:
Michael Olson and Penny Payne Olson
Defendant:
Michael J. Sposato
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Olson et al v. County Of Nassau et al
as 1:2015cv00024
Defendant:
County Of Nassau, County of Nassau Correctional Center, Correction Officers John Does 1-25 and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Olson and Penny Payne Olson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Olson et al v. The County of Nassau et al
as 2:2015cv00024
Defendant:
County of Nassau County Correctional Center, John Does 1-25, Nassau County Police Department and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Olson and Penny Payne Olson
Cross Defendant:
The County of Nassau
Cross Claimant:
The Town of North Hempstead
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00758
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
Olson v. Abate et al
as 3:2013cv50036
Plaintiff:
Kevin Michael Olson
Defendant:
James Abate, Daniel Riportella, Brandon Straw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Anthon v. Shinseki et al
as 2:2009cv00974
Plaintiff:
Robert Eric Anthon
Defendant:
Eric K Shinseki, Chris Norton and Michael Olson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Olson v. City of Bainbridge Island
as 3:2008cv05513
Plaintiff:
Michael Olson
Defendant:
City of Bainbridge Island
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
