Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Ok Kim v. Lori Eisner
as 17-1790
Plaintiff - Appellant:
OK CHA KIM
Defendant - Appellee:
LORI JOY EISNER, Esq (Official Capacity); General Equity Master, KENDRA YOUNG AUSBY, Associate Judge, Official Capacity, W. MICHEL PIERSON, Circuit Administrative Judge, Official Capacity and others
Kim v. Eisner et al
as 1:2017cv01685
Plaintiff:
Ok Cha Kim
Defendant:
Lori Joy Eisner , Kendra Young Ausby , W. Michel Pierson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
KIM v. EISNER et al
as 1:2017cv00803
Plaintiff:
OK CHA KIM
Defendant:
LORI JOY EISNER , KENDRA YOUNG AUSBY , W. MICHEL PIERSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Norvel Lassere v. Keith Carroll, et al
as 15-30319
Plaintiff - Appellee:
NORVEL LASSERE
Defendant - Appellant:
MICHAEL TREGRE, St. John the Baptist Parish Sheriff, OFFICER STEVEN DAILEY, JOSE REL and others
Murdock v. BWW Law Group et al
as 1:2014cv04043
Plaintiff:
Robin Murdock
Defendant:
BWW Law Group, Freedom Mortgage Corp., Cynthia Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MURDOCK v. BWW LAW GROUP et al
as 1:2014cv02100
Plaintiff:
ROBIN MURDOCK
Defendant:
BWW LAW GROUP, FREEDOM MORTGAGE CORP., CYNTHIA JONES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Murdock v. Ward, et al.
as 1:2014cv03839
Plaintiff:
Robin Murdock
Defendant:
Carrie M. Ward, Howard N. Bierman, Howard Bierman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MURDOCK v. WARD et al
as 1:2014cv01947
Plaintiff:
ROBIN MURDOCK
Defendant:
CARRIE M. WARD, HOWARD N. BIERMAN, HOWARD BIERMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
T. Gray v. David Yavil, et al
as 12-1536
Plaintiff - Appellant:
T. BARRY GRAY
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID A. YAVIL, WALTER H. SWAYZE, SEGAL MCCAMBRIDGE SINGER & MAHONEY and others
Giles-Brummit v. City of Detroit et al
as 2:2011cv13488
Plaintiff:
Raphael Demontee-Metz Giles-Brummit
Defendant:
Detroit, City of , Dieasree Harrell-Currey, Michelle Pierson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
