Cases 1 - 10 of 83
Caldwell, Sr. v. Roberts et al
as 3:2023cv01112
Plaintiff:
Dr. Keith R. Caldwell, Sr.
Defendant:
John Roberts, William H. Pryor, Jr., Mary S. Scriven and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Caldwell v. Roberts et al
as 8:2023cv00918
Plaintiff:
Keith Robert Caldwell, Sr.
Defendant:
John Roberts, William H. Pryor, Jr., Mary S. Scriven and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Velasquez v. McElroy et al
as 1:2023cv00015
Plaintiff:
Diego Velasquez
Defendant:
Mary S. McElroy, Lynch and Thompson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv04970
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03420
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00243
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Wereko v. Rosen et al
as 1:2022cv02177
Plaintiff:
Vanessa Wereko
Defendant:
Hon. Lori Rosen, David E. Haracz, Raul Vega and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Wereko v. Rosen et al
as 1:2022cv02178
Plaintiff:
Vanessa Wereko
Defendant:
Hon. Lori Rosen, David E. Haracz, Raul Vega and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv02121
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans w/ Disabilities Act (ADA)
Gregory Darst v. Mary S. Scriven, et al
as 22-10918
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GREGORY ALBERT DARST
Defendant / Appellee:
SCOTT HARRIS, MARY S. SCRIVEN, DAVID J. SMITH and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
