Cases 1 - 10 of 63
A. Philip Randolph Institute v. North Carolina State Board of Elections
as 24-1512
Plaintiff:
NORTH CAROLINA A. PHILIP RANDOLPH INSTITUTE and ACTION NC
Defendant:
NORTH CAROLINA STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS, DAMON CIRCOSTA, in his official capacity as CHAIR OF THE STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS, STELLA ANDERSON, in her official capacity as SECRETARY OF THE STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS and others
Signorelli v. Merriweather County et al
as 3:2024cv00099
Plaintiff:
William Jay Signorelli, Jr
Defendant:
Merriweather County and Manchester Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Incorrectly Filed
as 3:2024cv00134
Plaintiff:
Kendall Merriweather
Defendant:
Mark Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Merriweather v. Davis
as 3:2024cv00135
Plaintiff:
Kendall Merriweather
Defendant:
Mark Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Merriweather v. Owens
as 3:2024cv00136
Plaintiff:
Kendall Merriweather
Defendant:
Justin Owens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Merriweather v. Brown
as 3:2024cv00138
Plaintiff:
Kendall Merriweather
Defendant:
Craig Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Merriweather v. Beaumont
as 3:2024cv00133
Plaintiff:
Kendall Merriweather
Defendant:
Liam Beaumont
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Merriweather v. Papillion
as 3:2024cv00137
Plaintiff:
Kendall Merriweather
Defendant:
Stacey Papillion
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
PLANNED PARENTHOOD SOUTH ATLANTIC et al v. STEIN et al
as 1:2023cv00480
Plaintiff:
PLANNED PARENTHOOD SOUTH ATLANTIC and Dr. BEVERLY GRAY, MD
Defendant:
JOSHUA STEIN, TODD M. WILLIAMS, JIM O'NEILL and others
Intervenor Defendant:
PHILIP E. BERGER and TIMOTHY K. MOORE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Samuels v. McFadden et al
as 3:2023cv00329
Plaintiff:
Byron Lamar Samuels, Jr
Defendant:
Garry McFadden, Roy Cooper, Kristin Cooper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
