Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Mowrey v. Delaney
as 2:2023cv00847
Plaintiff:
Thomas Mowrey
Defendant:
Jenifer E. Delaney and Jennifer E. Delaney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Cecile Lescs v. City of Winchester
as 22-1093
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CECILE M. LESCS
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF WINCHESTER, ANIMAL WARDEN LIANG, ANIMAL WARDEN SLONAKER and others
Defendant:
KEVIN SANZENBACHER, Former Chief of Police, LIEUTENANT BAUSERMAN, MR. HESS and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00927
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Lescs v. City of Winchester et al
as 5:2019cv00061
Defendant:
Ltn Bauserman, Eden Freeman, Animal Warden Liang and others
Plaintiff:
Cecile M. Lescs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00307
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mowrey v. Windham et al
as 3:2018cv00584
Defendant:
Town of Windham , Willimantic Police Dept. , Willimantic Switchboard Fire Chiefs Association, Incorporated and others
Plaintiff:
David J Mowrey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00261
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00262
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00260
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Jones et al v. Mowrey et al
as 1:2015cv04497
Plaintiff:
Anwah Jones and William S. Watkins
Defendant:
Brandon L. Mowrey, James G. Carson, Robert C. Bagwell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
