Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Smith v. Novoa
as 1:2024cv00199
Plaintiff:
Candace Smith
Defendant:
Dannette Novoa
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Adriana Novoa, et al v. Commissioner of the FL State Board of Education, et al
as 22-13994
Plaintiff / Appellee:
ADRIANA NOVOA, SAMUEL RECHEK and FIRST AMENDMENT FORUM AT UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA
Defendant / Appellant:
COMMISSIONER OF THE FLORIDA STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION, BRIAN LAMB, ERIC SILAGY and others
NOVOA et al v. DIAZ JR et al
as 4:2022cv00324
Plaintiff:
ADRIANA NOVOA, SAMUEL RECHEK and FIRST AMENDMENT FORUM AT UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA
Defendant:
Commissioner of the Manny Diaz, Jr., Florida Board of Gov TIMOTHY M CERIO, Florida Board of Gov RICHARD CORCORAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 21-16603
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 21-1739
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00271
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Barberi v. Joaquin A. Novoa, D.D.S., P.A. et al
as 1:2020cv24296
Defendant:
JOAQUIN A. NOVOA, D.D.S., P.A. and JOAQUIN A. NOVOA
Plaintiff:
Renzo Barberi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv02535
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Caplan v. REINALDO PAINT & BODY SHOP, INC. et al
as 1:2019cv22460
Defendant:
REINALDO NOVOA, JUANA M. NOVOA and REINALDO PAINT & BODY SHOP, INC.
Plaintiff:
Howard Michael Caplan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
Nixon v. Guzman et al
as 4:2016cv00460
Plaintiff:
Tony Nixon
Defendant:
Daniel Guzman, William Stiness, Henry Lopez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
