Cases 1 - 10 of 33
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv01563
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv07537
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00529
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
LIN et al v. AVR ENTERPRISES, LLC et al
as 2:2022cv05483
Plaintiff:
TOM LIN and YUCHI HAUNG
Defendant:
AVR ENTERPRISES, LLC, ALTICE USA, INC. d/b/a OPTIMUM, JOHN DOE (alternative fictitious person) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrim
Campos v. BMW Miami
as 22-1555
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Joseph Campos
Defendant / Appellee:
BMW Miami, TD Bank, Coney Island Hospital and others
O'Diah v. United States Small Business Administration et al
as 1:2022cv04685
Defendant:
United States Small Business Administration, New York State Temporary and Disability Assistance, State of New York Executive Department Victim Service and others
Plaintiff:
Aror-Ark Ark O'Diah
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sims v. Optimum TV et al
as 1:2022cv03750
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Sims
Defendant:
Optimum TV, Michelle Baez and Con Edison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv09848
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv01002
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv00135
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
