Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Pittman v. Georgia, State of et al
as 2:2021cv00785
Defendant:
Lenn Wood, Georgia, State of, Jonathan W Horton and others
Plaintiff:
Randy Dewayne Pittman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pittman v. United States Department of Justice et al
as 2:2020cv02026
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Investigation and United States Department of Justice
Plaintiff:
Randy Dewayne Pittman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pittman v. Pittman
as 2:2020cv01599
Plaintiff:
Randy Dewayne Pittman
Defendant:
Amber Bailey Pittman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Beaty v. Dunn et al
as 2:2020cv00279
Defendant:
Greg Lovelace, Markeon Person, Deon Steele and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Adam Beaty
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Antoine v. Verin et al
as 2:2017cv01859
Plaintiff:
Lisa Hope Antoine
Defendant:
Eugene Raymond Verin , Terri Willingham Thomas , William Cooper Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mortazavi v. Samford University et al
as 2:2017cv00559
Plaintiff:
Massoud Mortazavi
Defendant:
Samford University, Andrew Westmoreland and Wayne Pittman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv01931
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Parker v. Judicial Inquiry Commission of the State of Alabama et al
as 2:2016cv00442
Plaintiff:
Tom Parker
Defendant:
Judicial Inquiry Commission of the State of Alabama , Billy C. Bedsole , David Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Moore v. Judicial Inquiry Commission of the State of Alabama et al
as 2:2016cv00388
Plaintiff:
Roy S. Moore
Defendant:
Judicial Inquiry Commission of the State of Alabama , Billy C. Bedsole , David Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hayden v. Vance, et al. (MAG+)
as 2:2015cv00469
Plaintiff:
Steven Mark Hayden
Defendant:
Robert S. Vance, Jr. , Anne-Marie Adams , J. Scott Vowell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
