Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Pulte Home Corporation v. Montgomery County, Maryland
as 17-2112
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PULTE HOME CORPORATION, and Shiloh Farm Investments LLC
Defendant - Appellee:
MONTGOMERY COUNTY, MARYLAND and MARYLAND-NATIONAL CAPITAL PARK AND PLANNING COMMISSION
Pulte Home Corporation and Shiloh Farm Investments LLC v. Montgomery County, Maryland et al
as 8:2014cv03955
Plaintiff:
Pulte Home Corporation and Shiloh Farm Investments LLC
Defendant:
Montgomery County, Maryland and Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
PULTE HOMES, INC. et al v. GODDARD et al
as 1:2010cv00377
Plaintiff:
PULTE HOMES, INC. , PULTE HOME CORPORATION and PULTE MORTGAGE LLC
Defendant:
TERRY GODDARD and CATHERINE CORTEZ MASTO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv07083
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 09-15837
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv00493
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv01248
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv01234
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2008cv01104
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv00662
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
