Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Auk et al v. Detroit, City of et al
as 4:2023cv10897
Plaintiff:
Bryan Auk and Anthony Auk
Defendant:
Detroit, City of, Alonzo Jones, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gary Dubin, et al v. Supreme Court State of Hawaii, et al
as 21-16863
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GARY VICTOR DUBIN, individually and on behalf of all Hawaii attorneys similarly situated, DBA Dubin Law Offices, CHRISTIE ADAMS, TORU AKEHI and others
Defendant / Appellee:
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAII, in its legislative rule-making capacity and in its judicial capacity, THE HONORABLE MARK E. RECKENWALD, in his official capacity while serving as Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of the State of Hawaii, THE HONORABLE PAULA A. NAKAYAMA, in her official capacity while serving as Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the State of Hawaii and others
Hart v. Collins et al
as 2:2020cv13324
Defendant:
Paul Collins, Macomb County and Charter Township of Clinton
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Hart
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Paul Yongo v. John McHugh
as 13-1792
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PAUL COLLINS YONGO
Defendant - Appellee:
HONORABLE JOHN MCHUGH, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Army, DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, Financial Management Service, J. HORNE, in his official capacity as a military pay technician and others
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY, HONORABLE ROBERT GATES, DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE and others
Yongo v. Department of the Army Et al. et al
as 5:2010cv00220
Plaintiff:
Paul Collins Yongo
Defendant:
Department of the Army Et al., Robert Gates, Department of the Army and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Collins v. Wal-Mart Stores Inc
as 3:2007cv01780
Plaintiff:
Paul Collins and Paul Collins
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores Inc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
