Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Reginald Johnson v. The City Of Satsuma, Alabama, et al
as 23-11481
Plaintiff / Appellant:
REGINALD JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
THE CITY OF SATSUMA, ALABAMA and MAURICE KIRK HARLESS
Johnson v. The City of Satsuma, Alabama et al
as 1:2022cv00255
Plaintiff:
Reginald Johnson
Defendant:
The City of Satsuma, Alabama and Maurice Kirk Harless
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv00686
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Tabor v. Georgia Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2019cv05531
Plaintiff:
Celisa Tabor
Defendant:
Reginald Johnson, Claude S. Lett, Ted Philbin and others
Johnson v. Samsung Electronics America Inc et al
as 4:2019cv00246
Defendant:
Nisi-Texas Inc and Samsung Electronics America Inc
Plaintiff:
Reginald Johnson
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
Johnson v. Maryland Department of Transportation et al
as 1:2018cv01059
Plaintiff:
Reginald Johnson
Defendant:
Maryland Department of Transportation, John Doe #1, John Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reginald Johnson v. FBI, et al
as 17-20443
Plaintiff - Appellant:
REGINALD JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and UNITED STATES EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION
Reginald Johnson v. FBI, et al
as 16-20806
Plaintiff - Appellant:
REGINALD JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and U. S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION
Reginald Johnson v. USA
as 16-13291
Plaintiff - Appellant:
REGINALD JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION (FBI) and others
Johnson v. Federal Bureau of Investigation et al
as 4:2016cv01337
Plaintiff:
Reginald Johnson
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Investigation and U. S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
