Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Connors v. USA et al
as 1:2019cv00993
Plaintiff:
Colin Richard Connors
Defendant:
State of Colorado, William P. Barr, Phil Weiser and others
Interested Party:
Wayne K. Wilson, Karen Diann Davis Hughes, Nancy Taggerty and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00428
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Washington v. Connor et al
as 1:2011cv11478
Plaintiff:
Shaka Washington
Defendant:
Richard Connor, Michael Lavey and Michael Goodwin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wright v. Autozone et al
as 2:2010cv02934
Plaintiff:
Glenn Rodney Wright
Defendant:
Autozone, Richard Connor, U.S. Gov - Techno Division and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stefanik v. City Of Holyoke, et al
as 09-1905
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS STEFANIK
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF HOLYOKE, JOHN HART, LAURENCE P. COURNOYER, JR. and others
Thomas Stefanik v. City Of Holyoke, et al
as 09-1843
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS STEFANIK
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF HOLYOKE, SHAWN WILLIS, Individual capacity, KAREN BETOURNAY and others
Stefanik v. City of Holyoke, et al
as 3:2008cv30136
Plaintiff:
Thomas Stefanik
Defendant:
City of Holyoke, Shawn Willis, Karen Betournay and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Stefanik v. City of Holyoke, et al
as 3:2008cv30106
Plaintiff:
Thomas Stefanik
Defendant:
City of Holyoke, City of Holyoke, John Hart and others
Counter Claimant:
Loney Westbrook, Loney Westbrook, Richard Connors and others
Counter Defendant:
Thomas Stefanik
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
OLLINGER v. COUNTY OF CAMDEN et al
as 1:2008cv00035
Plaintiff:
JOHN OLLINGER
Defendant:
COUNTY OF CAMDEN, COUNTY OF CAMDEN DEPARTMENT OF THE SHERIFF, COUNTY OF CAMDEN CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
