Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01039
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv04997
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Jones v. City of New York
as 1:2022cv03924
Defendant:
CITY OF NEW YORK, P.O. Robert Holmes, P.O. Liang Lin and others
Plaintiff:
Shafiyq Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Holloway #159258 v. Bell et al
as 1:2022cv00428
Plaintiff:
Randy Holloway #159258
Defendant:
Robert Holmes Bell, Timothy P. Greeley and Solomon Radner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Komatsu v. The City of New York et al
as 21-1952
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Towaki Komatsu
Defendant / Appellee:
City of New York, NYPD Officer Saquoi Harris, Shield #2350, NYPD Officer Steven Perez, Shield 23485 and others
Komatsu v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2020cv10942
Defendant:
NYPD Matthew Pereira, NYPD Officer Rodriguez, Neelam Chhikara and others
Plaintiff:
Towaki Komatsu
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv04729
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Batiste-Swilley v. City of Baton Rouge et al
as 3:2017cv00443
Defendant:
Dustin Brown, Robert Holmes, Raymond Klug and others
Plaintiff:
Lisa Batiste-Swilley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holmes III v. Williams
as 2:2015cv02176
Petitioner:
Robert Holmes III
Respondent:
Brian Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Holmes v. Internal Revenue Services et al
as 2:2015cv01456
Defendant:
Capital One Bank, Internal Revenue Services, Loss Mitigation Title Services and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Holmes, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
