Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Freeze v. Redd et al
as 2:2024cv00640
Defendant:
Robert Powell, Brian Redd, Bart Mortensen and others
Plaintiff:
Jason Freeze
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00092
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. - Americans with Disabilities Act
Meeks v. Weston et al
as 3:2023cv00066
Plaintiff:
Eddie L. Meeks
Defendant:
Robert Weston and Robert Powell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv06383
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv09044
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Howard Zochlinski v. Richard Blum, et al
as 16-16485
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HOWARD ALAN ZOCHLINSKI
Defendant - Appellee:
RICHARD C. BLUM, WILLIAM DE LA PENA, RUSSELL GOULD and others
Redmond, et al v. Crowther, et al
as 16-4131
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TIMOTHY REDMOND, NICK WATSON, GEORGE MONFORT and others
Defendant - Appellee:
SCOTT CROWTHER, as successor to Alfred Bigelow in his official capacity, ROBERT POWELL and JASON NICHOLES
Clifton v. Jeff Davis County, Georgia et al
as 2:2016cv00108
Plaintiff:
Tyler Brent Clifton
Defendant:
Jeff Davis County, Georgia, Jeff Davis County Board of Commissioners, Ray Wooten and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Redmond et al v. Bigelow et al
as 2:2013cv00393
Plaintiff:
Timothy Redmond , Nick Watson , George Monfort and others
Defendant:
Alfred Bigelow , Robert Powell and FNU Anderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Powell et al v. Galveston County
as 3:2012cv00215
Plaintiff:
Robert Powell , Brad Bricker and Kirk Greene
Defendant:
Galveston County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
