Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Association of Oregon Corrections Employees et al v. State of Oregon et al
as 6:2021cv01485
Plaintiff:
Association of Oregon Corrections Employees, Eric Zehner, Melanie McPhereson and others
Defendant:
State of Oregon, Oregon Department of Administrative Services, Oregon Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Rouse v. Donahue
as 3:2020cv06068
Defendant:
FBI Agent Julie Lockard, Napa Sheriff Department Operations and Training Policies, Brian Donahue and others
Plaintiff:
Xezakia Rouse
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv01094
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2016cv06840
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
SPENCER v. YOUNG et al
as 4:2014cv00660
Defendant:
MORRIS YOUNG, CITY OF QUINCY , QUINCY INTERNET CAFE and others
Plaintiff:
TIFFANY SPENCER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WIGGINS v. YOUNG et al
as 4:2014cv00591
Plaintiff:
FELICIA WIGGINS
Defendant:
MORRIS YOUNG and RODNEY MOORE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
GOODSON v. YOUNG et al
as 4:2014cv00386
Plaintiff:
MICKEY LYNN GOODSON
Defendant:
MORRIS YOUNG, RODNEY MOORE and WILLIAM BUCKHALT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
SCONYERS et al v. YOUNG et al
as 4:2014cv00243
Plaintiff:
VASHOUN SCONYERS and LATONYA LEWIS
Defendant:
MORRIS YOUNG , RODNEY MOORE , JEFFREY STOWELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Omari v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2014cv02324
Defendant:
Police Officer Rodney Moore and The City of New York
Plaintiff:
Annas Omari
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Patrick Christian v. Rodney Moore
as 13-1367
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PATRICK O. CHRISTIAN
Defendant - Appellee:
RODNEY MOORE, DANIEL E. BAILEY, JR., JAMES TOWNSEND and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
