Cases 1 - 10 of 112
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00294
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00220
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1376
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
SAUERS v. OAK PROPERTY MANAGEMENT et al
as 2:2023cv05146
Plaintiff:
PETER SAUERS
Defendant:
OAK PROPERTY MANAGEMENT, ASHLEY MANAGEMENT CO., COUNTY BUILDERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Guynup v. Richardson et al
as 5:2023cv00072
Plaintiff:
Traci Guynup
Defendant:
Jean Richardson, Mr. Todd Sauers, Officer Terry Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-3145
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Brice v. The C.F. Sauer Brands, Inc. et al.
as 3:2023cv00403
Plaintiff:
William E Brice and William E. Brice, Sr.
Defendant:
The C.F. Sauer Brands, Inc. and Falfurrias Capital Partners
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Fredrika Miller, et al v. Montgomery Police Department, et al
as 23-11776
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FREDRIKA MORRISSETTE MILLER and GARY L. SAUER, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
MONTGOMERY POLICE DEPARTMENT and ALEA
Fredrika Miller, et al v. City of Montgomery, et al
as 23-11372
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FREDRIKA MORRISSETTE MILLER and GARY L. SAUER, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF MONTGOMERY and COUNTY OF MONTGOMERY, ALABAMA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01271
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
