Cases 1 - 10 of 82
Di Gregorio, et al v. Rodriguez-Velez, et al
as 22-1463
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ERNESTO DI GREGORIO and ECOLIFT CORPORATION
Defendant / Appellee:
ROSA EMILIA RODRIGUEZ-VELEZ, EDWARD GANTAR VERONDA and IVAN SERPA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv02762
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans w/ Disabilities Act (ADA)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv04287
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv04287
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Di Gregorio et al v. Rodriguez-Velez et al
as 3:2021cv01166
Defendant:
Rosa Emilia Rodriguez-Velez, Edward Veronda and Ivan Serpa
Plaintiff:
Ernesto Di Gregorio and Ecolift Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Di Gregorio et al v. Rodriguez-Velez et al
as 3:2021cv01167
Defendant:
Rosa Emilia Rodriguez-Velez, Edward Veronda and Ivan Serpa
Plaintiff:
Ernesto Di Gregorio and Ecolift Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Di Gregorio et al v. Rodriguez-Velez et al
as 3:2021cv01165
Defendant:
Rosa Emilia Rodriguez-Velez, Edward Veronda and Ivan Serpa
Plaintiff:
Ernesto Di Gregorio and Ecolift Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Serpa et al v. Strada Properties, LLC et al
as 3:2018cv00228
Plaintiff:
Wayne Caldwell, Jr., Sarah Serpa and Z.H.
Defendant:
Steven Kauffman and Strada Properties, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Barr v. Probation Dept et al
as 3:2018cv00779
Plaintiff:
Tanya Barr
Defendant:
Probation Dept, V. Merizalde, G. Perez and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
SERPA v. JERSEY CITY HOUSING AUTHORITY
as 2:2018cv02886
Plaintiff:
JOSEPHINE SERPA
Defendant:
JERSEY CITY HOUSING AUTHORITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
